 |
Cangzhou |
(this season in the league) |
Cangzhou's progression (home & away) |
| Line graph variation: win:+2 draw:0 defeat:-1 |
Form
Results
| 2.5+ | CS | FTS | HT | |||||
| 2 Mar | Cangzhou |
0 - 2
0-1 Yuning Zhang (14) --------------------------------------- 0-2 Liyu Yang (90) pen. |
Beijing Guoan | - | - | + | 0-1 | stats |
| 10 Mar | Cangzhou |
1 - 0
--------------------------------------- 1-0 Oscar Taty Maritu (83) |
Chengdu | - | + | - | 0-0 | stats |
| 29 Mar | Sichuan Jiuniu |
2 - 2
0-1 Héber (12) pen. 1-1 Edu García (25) 2-1 Wei Zhang (45) --------------------------------------- 2-2 Oscar Taty Maritu (90) |
Cangzhou | + | - | - | 2-1 | stats |
| 4 Apr | Wuhan Three T. |
2 - 3
0-1 Héber (26) --------------------------------------- 0-2 Héber (61) 0-3 Oscar Taty Maritu (68) 1-3 Zhipeng Jiang (74) 2-3 Pedro Henrique (86) pen. |
Cangzhou | + | - | - | 0-1 | stats |
| 10 Apr | Cangzhou |
2 - 0
1-0 Oscar Taty Maritu (43) --------------------------------------- 2-0 Stoppila Sunzu (47) |
Changchun Yatai | - | + | - | 1-0 | stats |
| 14 Apr | Cangzhou |
3 - 2
0-1 Gang Feng (3) 0-2 Jean-David Beauguel (6) --------------------------------------- 1-2 Solomon-Otabor Viv (50) 2-2 Yingjie Zhao (62) 3-2 Héber (68) |
Qingdao West C. | + | - | - | 0-2 | stats |
| 20 Apr | Shandong T. |
4 - 1
1-0 Abudulam Abdurasul (21) 2-0 Yuanyi Li (39) 3-0 Fernandinho (45) pen. --------------------------------------- 4-0 Valeri Qazaishvili (66) 4-1 Oscar Taty Maritu (90) |
Cangzhou | + | - | - | 3-0 | stats |
| 26 Apr | Cangzhou |
2 - 3
0-1 Frank Acheampong (33) --------------------------------------- 1-1 Héber (63) 2-1 Solomon-Otabor Viv (72) 2-2 Iago Maidana (79) 2-3 Iago Maidana (83) |
Henan SL | + | - | - | 0-1 | stats |
| 1 May | S. Shenhua |
4 - 0
1-0 Xu Haoyang (3) --------------------------------------- 2-0 Zhu Chenjie (50) 3-0 André Luis (76) 4-0 André Luis (90) |
Cangzhou | + | - | + | 1-0 | stats |
| 5 May | Meizhou Hakka |
1 - 1
0-1 Héber (29) --------------------------------------- 1-1 Nebojsa Kosovic (67) |
Cangzhou | - | - | - | 0-1 | stats |
| Filter Cangzhou results | ||||||||
| Points Per Game | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Home | Away | Opponent | ||||
| 12 May | Cangzhou | h2h | Zhejiang | 1.80 | 0.75 | |
| 17 May | Cangzhou | h2h | Tianjin T. | 1.80 | 2.00 | |
| 21 May | Nantong Zhiyun | h2h | Cangzhou | 0.60 | 1.00 | |
| 26 May | Shanghai Port | h2h | Cangzhou | 2.50 | 1.00 | |
| 16 Jun | Cangzhou | h2h | Qingdao Hainiu | 1.80 | 0.67 | |
| 26 Jun | Beijing Guoan | h2h | Cangzhou | 1.75 | 1.00 | |
| 30 Jun | Chengdu | h2h | Cangzhou | 2.17 | 1.00 | |
| 6 Jul | Cangzhou | h2h | Sichuan Jiuniu | 1.80 | 1.40 | |
| 12 Jul | Cangzhou | h2h | Wuhan Three T. | 1.80 | 1.00 | |
| 27 Jul | Changchun Yatai | h2h | Cangzhou | 0.20 | 1.00 | |
| 2 Aug | Qingdao West C. | h2h | Cangzhou | 1.00 | 1.00 | |
| 9 Aug | Cangzhou | h2h | Shandong T. | 1.80 | 1.75 | |
| 16 Aug | Henan SL | h2h | Cangzhou | 1.00 | 1.00 | |
| 24 Aug | Cangzhou | h2h | S. Shenhua | 1.80 | 2.60 | |
| 14 Sep | Cangzhou | h2h | Meizhou Hakka | 1.80 | 1.25 | |
| 22 Sep | Zhejiang | h2h | Cangzhou | 1.67 | 1.00 | |
| 29 Sep | Tianjin T. | h2h | Cangzhou | 0.50 | 1.00 | |
| 20 Oct | Cangzhou | h2h | Nantong Zhiyun | 1.80 | 1.00 | |
| 27 Oct | Cangzhou | h2h | Shanghai Port | 1.80 | 2.20 | |
| 2 Nov | Qingdao Hainiu | h2h | Cangzhou | 0.75 | 1.00 | |
| Average of Opponent PPG values above | 1.34 | |||||
| The Points Per Game values are calculated based on Home results only for the home team and away results only for the visiting team. | ||||||
Run-in overview | ||||||
|
Of their 20 remaining matches in the Chinese league, Cangzhou will be playing as many matches at home and away (10 in each case).
Considering the opponents' Points Per Game (PPG) values above, Cangzhou's remaining home matches feature a higher combined opposition PPG average than their remaining away matches.
Cangzhou's opponents to be played in home games currently have a combined average of 1.46 Points Per Game in their away matches played so far this season in the league. As for the hosts that Cangzhou will be visiting, so far this season they have a combined average of 1.21 Points Per Game at home in the league. | ||||||
| View opponents PPG values for all teams | ||||||
| Dates based on GMT time. Please note that match schedules and timing are subject to changes. |
Current Streaks & Sequences
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Comparison with league average
|
Cangzhou (10 matches) compared to league average
Cangzhou at home (5 matches) compared to league average at home
Cangzhou away (5 matches) compared to league average away
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| The 'League average' indicator refers to the average value for all teams in the league since the beginning of the season. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Cangzhou goals statistics indicate an average of 1.50 goals scored per game so far this season, which is higher than the average number of 1.39 goals scored by each team per match this season in the league, all teams combined in China - Super League. |
First goal, leading & trailing
|
Cangzhou | |
| Leading & trailing stats (total) | (this season in the league) |
| OPENING GOALS (total) | Matches | |
| Team scored first | 5 / 10 | 50% |
| Opponent scored first | 5 / 10 | 50% |
| HALF-TIME LEAD (total) | Matches | |
| Team was leading at half-time | 3 / 10 | 30% |
| Opponent was leading at half-time | 6 / 10 | 60% |
| LEAD STATUS AVERAGE MINUTES (total) | per match | |||
| Average minutes leading | 19.8 min. | 22% | ||
| Average minutes level in goals | 32.9 min. | 37% | ||
| Average minutes trailing | 37.3 min. | 41% | ||
| Note: in the table above, to allow for averaging duration values based on a total of 90 minutes per game, goals scored on the 45th minute and during added time of the first half are all considered to be scored on the 45th minute, and goals scored on the 90th minute and during added time of the second half are also considered scored on the 90th minute. | ||||
| In this example, Cangzhou have been in the lead for an average duration of 19.8 minutes per match (based on a 90-minute match duration), which is lower than the average duration of 37.3 minutes per match during which their opponents were in the lead in those matches. | ||||
|
Cangzhou | |
| Equalizer goals (total) | (this season in the league) |
| Matches played | 10 |
| DEFENDING THE LEAD (total) | |
| Goals giving the lead | 7 |
| Equalizer goals conceded | 3 |
| Lead defending rate * (1) | 57% |
| EQUALIZING (total) | |
| Goals giving the lead to the opponent | 7 |
| Equalizer goals scored | 3 |
| Equalizing rate * (2) | 43% |
| NON-CRUCIAL GOALS (total) | |
| Non-crucial goals scored | 5 |
| Non-crucial goals conceded | 10 |
(1) 100 - ((Equalizer goals conceded / Goals giving lead) * 100)
(2) (Equalizer goals scored / Goals giving lead to opponent) * 100
Non-crucial goals scored: goals scored that increased an existing lead, or decreased the opponent's existing lead.
Non-crucial goals conceded: goals conceded that decreased an existing lead, or increased the opponent's existing lead.
Note regarding the Goals giving the lead and the Goals giving the lead to the opponent values: both the team and the opponent team might take the lead more than once during a single match,
so the total number of goals giving the lead to a team might be higher than the number of matches played by the team.
For more info on how many times each team has taken the lead per match or how many times per match their opponents have taken the lead, you may want to view the following pages:
Goals giving the lead and equalizers conceded
Goals giving lead to opponent and equalizers scored
For info on the number of points won or lost by each team after the 75th minute, you may want to access the following page:
Points Won/Lost
Lead-defending ability
Cangzhou have taken the lead 7 times and have conceded an equalizer on 3 instances, translating into a lead-defending rate of 57% (for an opponents' equalizing rate of 43%).
Equalizing ability
Of the 7 times that Cangzhou's opponents have taken the lead, Cangzhou have managed to score an equalizer on 3 instances, translating into an equalizing rate of 43%.
|
Cangzhou | |
| Leading & trailing stats (home) | (this season in the league, home matches) |
| OPENING GOALS (home) | Matches | |
| Team scored first | 2 / 5 | 40% |
| Opponent scored first | 3 / 5 | 60% |
| HALF-TIME LEAD (home) | Matches | |
| Team was leading at half-time | 1 / 5 | 20% |
| Opponent was leading at half-time | 3 / 5 | 60% |
| LEAD STATUS AVERAGE MINUTES (home) | per match | |||
| Average minutes leading | 16.6 min. | 18% | ||
| Average minutes level in goals | 39.0 min. | 43% | ||
| Average minutes trailing | 34.4 min. | 38% | ||
| Note: in the table above, to allow for averaging duration values based on a total of 90 minutes per game, goals scored on the 45th minute and during added time of the first half are all considered to be scored on the 45th minute, and goals scored on the 90th minute and during added time of the second half are also considered scored on the 90th minute. | ||||
| In this example, Cangzhou have been in the lead for an average duration of 16.6 minutes per match played at home (based on a 90-minute match duration), which is lower than the average duration of 34.4 minutes per match during which their opponents were in the lead in those matches. | ||||
|
Cangzhou | |
| Equalizer goals (home) | (this season in the league, home matches) |
| Matches played | 5 |
| DEFENDING THE LEAD (home) | |
| Goals giving the lead | 4 |
| Equalizer goals conceded | 1 |
| Lead defending rate * (1) | 75% |
| EQUALIZING (home) | |
| Goals giving the lead to the opponent | 4 |
| Equalizer goals scored | 2 |
| Equalizing rate * (2) | 50% |
| NON-CRUCIAL GOALS (home) | |
| Non-crucial goals scored | 2 |
| Non-crucial goals conceded | 2 |
(1) 100 - ((Equalizer goals conceded / Goals giving lead) * 100)
(2) (Equalizer goals scored / Goals giving lead to opponent) * 100
Non-crucial goals scored: goals scored that increased an existing lead, or decreased the opponent's existing lead.
Non-crucial goals conceded: goals conceded that decreased an existing lead, or increased the opponent's existing lead.
Note regarding the Goals giving the lead and the Goals giving the lead to the opponent values: both the team and the opponent team might take the lead more than once during a single match,
so the total number of goals giving the lead to a team might be higher than the number of matches played by the team.
For more info on how many times each team has taken the lead per match or how many times per match their opponents have taken the lead, you may want to view the following pages:
Goals giving the lead and equalizers conceded
Goals giving lead to opponent and equalizers scored
For info on the number of points won or lost by each team after the 75th minute, you may want to access the following page:
Points Won/Lost
Lead-defending ability (at home)
In home matches, Cangzhou have taken the lead 4 times and have conceded an equalizer on 1 occasion, translating into a home lead-defending rate of 75% (for an opponents' equalizing rate of 25%).
Equalizing ability (at home)
Of the 4 times that Cangzhou's opponents have taken the lead when Cangzhou were playing at home, Cangzhou have managed to score an equalizer on 2 occasions, translating into a home equalizing rate of 50%.
|
Cangzhou | |
| Leading & trailing stats (away) | (this season in the league, away matches) |
| OPENING GOALS (away) | Matches | |
| Team scored first | 3 / 5 | 60% |
| Opponent scored first | 2 / 5 | 40% |
| HALF-TIME LEAD (away) | Matches | |
| Team was leading at half-time | 2 / 5 | 40% |
| Opponent was leading at half-time | 3 / 5 | 60% |
| LEAD STATUS AVERAGE MINUTES (away) | per match | |||
| Average minutes leading | 23.0 min. | 26% | ||
| Average minutes level in goals | 26.8 min. | 30% | ||
| Average minutes trailing | 40.2 min. | 45% | ||
| Note: in the table above, to allow for averaging duration values based on a total of 90 minutes per game, goals scored on the 45th minute and during added time of the first half are all considered to be scored on the 45th minute, and goals scored on the 90th minute and during added time of the second half are also considered scored on the 90th minute. | ||||
| In this example, Cangzhou have been in the lead for an average duration of 23.0 minutes per match played away (based on a 90-minute match duration), which is lower than the average duration of 40.2 minutes per match during which their opponents were in the lead in those matches. | ||||
|
Cangzhou | |
| Equalizer goals (away) | (this season in the league, away matches) |
| Matches played | 5 |
| DEFENDING THE LEAD (away) | |
| Goals giving the lead | 3 |
| Equalizer goals conceded | 2 |
| Lead defending rate * (1) | 33% |
| EQUALIZING (away) | |
| Goals giving the lead to the opponent | 3 |
| Equalizer goals scored | 1 |
| Equalizing rate * (2) | 33% |
| NON-CRUCIAL GOALS (away) | |
| Non-crucial goals scored | 3 |
| Non-crucial goals conceded | 8 |
(1) 100 - ((Equalizer goals conceded / Goals giving lead) * 100)
(2) (Equalizer goals scored / Goals giving lead to opponent) * 100
Non-crucial goals scored: goals scored that increased an existing lead, or decreased the opponent's existing lead.
Non-crucial goals conceded: goals conceded that decreased an existing lead, or increased the opponent's existing lead.
Note regarding the Goals giving the lead and the Goals giving the lead to the opponent values: both the team and the opponent team might take the lead more than once during a single match,
so the total number of goals giving the lead to a team might be higher than the number of matches played by the team.
For more info on how many times each team has taken the lead per match or how many times per match their opponents have taken the lead, you may want to view the following pages:
Goals giving the lead and equalizers conceded
Goals giving lead to opponent and equalizers scored
For info on the number of points won or lost by each team after the 75th minute, you may want to access the following page:
Points Won/Lost
Lead-defending ability (away)
In away matches, Cangzhou have taken the lead 3 times and have conceded an equalizer on 2 occasions, translating into an away lead-defending rate of 33% (for an opponents' equalizing rate of 67%).
Equalizing ability (away)
Of the 3 times that Cangzhou's opponents have taken the lead when Cangzhou were playing away, Cangzhou have managed to score an equalizer on 1 occasion, translating into an away equalizing rate of 33%.
Results table
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Goals scored & conceded
| SCORING | Home | Away | All |
| Goals scored (GF) | 8 | 7 | 15 |
| GF per match | 1.60 | 1.40 | 1.50 |
| Goals conceded (GA) | 7 | 13 | 20 |
| GA per match | 1.40 | 2.60 | 2.00 |
| GF + GA per match | 3.00 | 4.00 | 3.50 |
| GF+GA over 0.5 | 100% | 100% | 100% |
| GF+GA over 1.5 | 80% | 100% | 90% |
| GF+GA over 2.5 | 40% | 80% | 60% |
| GF+GA over 3.5 | 40% | 80% | 60% |
| GF+GA over 4.5 | 40% | 40% | 40% |
| GF+GA over 5.5 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| GF+GA over 0.5 at HT | 80% | 100% | 90% |
| GF+GA over 1.5 at HT | 20% | 40% | 30% |
| GF+GA over 2.5 at HT | 0% | 40% | 20% |
| Cangzhou over 2.5 stats indicate a 60% value for the proportion of matches involving the team that had a total of over 2.5 goals, which is higher than the league average value of 52% of league matches that the over under stats indicate had a total number of goals over 2.5 this season in China - Super League. | |||
| League goals statistics | |||
No goal scored / conceded
| Home | Away | All | |
| Clean sheets | 40% | 0% | 20% |
| Won-to-nil | 40% | 0% | 20% |
| Failed to score | 20% | 20% | 20% |
| Lost-to-nil | 20% | 20% | 20% |
| League Scored in Both Halves stats | |||
Scoring & Conceding rates
| Home | Away | All | |
| Scoring Rate | 80% | 80% | 80% |
| Scoring Rate 1st-Half | 20% | 60% | 40% |
| Scoring Rate 2nd-Half | 80% | 60% | 70% |
| Scored in both halves | 20% | 40% | 30% |
| Both teams scored | 40% | 80% | 60% |
| Conceding Rate | 60% | 100% | 80% |
| Conceding Rate 1st-Half | 60% | 60% | 60% |
| Conceding Rate 2nd-Half | 40% | 80% | 60% |
| Conceded in both halves | 40% | 40% | 40% |
Scoring rate: percentage of matches where the team scored at least one goal
Conceding rate: percentage of matches where the team conceded at least one goal
Goals scored / Goals conceded
| Home | Away | All | |
| GF over 0.5 | 80% | 80% | 80% |
| GF over 1.5 | 60% | 40% | 50% |
| GF over 2.5 | 20% | 20% | 20% |
| GF over 3.5 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| GF over 4.5 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| GA over 0.5 | 60% | 100% | 80% |
| GA over 1.5 | 60% | 80% | 70% |
| GA over 2.5 | 20% | 40% | 30% |
| GA over 3.5 | 0% | 40% | 20% |
| GA over 4.5 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
GF: goals scored
GA: goals conceded
Total goals in Cangzhou matches
| SCORED + CONCEDED | Home | Away | All |
| Match total goals = 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| Match total goals = 1 | 20% | 0% | 10% |
| Match total goals = 2 | 40% | 20% | 30% |
| Match total goals = 3 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| Match total goals = 4 | 0% | 40% | 20% |
| Match total goals = 5+ | 40% | 40% | 40% |
| Match total goals = 0 or 1 | 20% | 0% | 10% |
| Match total goals = 2 or 3 | 40% | 20% | 30% |
| Match total goals = 4+ | 40% | 80% | 60% |
| League Total Goals stats | |||
Goal margins
| WINNING MARGINS | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4+ |
| Home wins | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Away wins | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Home & Away wins | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| LOSING MARGINS | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4+ |
| Home defeats | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Away defeats | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Home & Away defeats | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
|
A majority of Cangzhou's wins have been obtained with a one-goal margin (3 wins), while 1 of their wins had a margin of 2 goals or more. A majority of Cangzhou's defeats had a margin of 2 goals or more (3 defeats), while 1 of their defeats had a one-goal margin. |
||||
| League Goal Margin stats | ||||
Home vs Away comparisons
| Home / Away points | Home | Away | ||
| % Points | 64% | 36% | ||
| Home / Away PPG | ||||
| Points Per Game at Home (PPGH) | 1.80 | |||
| Points Per Game Away (PPGA) | 1.00 | |||
| Home advantage (PPGH - PPGA) | +0.80 | |||
| Home / Away goals | Home | Away | ||
| % Goals scored (GF) | 53% | 47% | ||
| % Goals conceded (GA) | 35% | 65% | ||
| League average (% goals) | 49% | 51% | ||
| Matches played at home have accounted for 64% of Cangzhou's total points and 53% of the goals they have scored so far this season in China - Super League. |
| League Home / Away tables |
Half-time lead
| Half-time | Home | Away | Total | |
| Leading at HT | 1 | 2 | 3 | 30% |
| Drawing at HT | 1 | 0 | 1 | 10% |
| Losing at HT | 3 | 3 | 6 | 60% |
| Total | 5 | 5 | 10 | |
| League Half-time stats | ||||
Goal times
|
Cangzhou |
| (this season in the league) |
| GOALS PER TIME SEGMENT (total) | ||||
| 0-15 | GF | 1 | ||
| GA | 4 | |||
| 16-30 | GF | 2 | ||
| GA | 2 | |||
| 31-45 | GF | 1 | ||
| GA | 4 | |||
| 46-60 | GF | 2 | ||
| GA | 1 | |||
| 61-75 | GF | 6 | ||
| GA | 3 | |||
| 76-90 | GF | 3 | ||
| GA | 6 | |||
| 1st Half | GF | 4 | 27% | |
| GA | 10 | 50% | ||
| 2nd Half | GF | 11 | 73% | |
| GA | 10 | 50% | ||
'31-45' and '76-90' include added time
GF: Goals scored ('goals for')
GA: Goals conceded ('goals against')
| AVERAGE MINUTES (total) | |
| Avg. minute goals scored | 58 |
| Avg. minute goals conceded | 50 |
|
Cangzhou |
| (this season in the league, home matches) |
| GOALS PER TIME SEGMENT (home) | ||||
| 0-15 | GF | 0 | ||
| GA | 3 | |||
| 16-30 | GF | 0 | ||
| GA | 0 | |||
| 31-45 | GF | 1 | ||
| GA | 1 | |||
| 46-60 | GF | 2 | ||
| GA | 0 | |||
| 61-75 | GF | 4 | ||
| GA | 0 | |||
| 76-90 | GF | 1 | ||
| GA | 3 | |||
| 1st Half | GF | 1 | 12% | |
| GA | 4 | 57% | ||
| 2nd Half | GF | 7 | 88% | |
| GA | 3 | 43% | ||
'31-45' and '76-90' include added time
GF: Goals scored ('goals for')
GA: Goals conceded ('goals against')
| AVERAGE MINUTES (home) | |
| Avg. minute goals scored | 61 |
| Avg. minute goals conceded | 44 |
|
Cangzhou |
| (this season in the league, away matches) |
| GOALS PER TIME SEGMENT (away) | ||||
| 0-15 | GF | 1 | ||
| GA | 1 | |||
| 16-30 | GF | 2 | ||
| GA | 2 | |||
| 31-45 | GF | 0 | ||
| GA | 3 | |||
| 46-60 | GF | 0 | ||
| GA | 1 | |||
| 61-75 | GF | 2 | ||
| GA | 3 | |||
| 76-90 | GF | 2 | ||
| GA | 3 | |||
| 1st Half | GF | 3 | 43% | |
| GA | 6 | 46% | ||
| 2nd Half | GF | 4 | 57% | |
| GA | 7 | 54% | ||
'31-45' and '76-90' include added time
GF: Goals scored ('goals for')
GA: Goals conceded ('goals against')
| AVERAGE MINUTES (away) | |
| Avg. minute goals scored | 54 |
| Avg. minute goals conceded | 53 |
Cangzhou scores
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| This season in the league |
| 73% of Cangzhou's goals have been scored in the second half. Cangzhou were losing at half-time in 6 of their 10 matches. |
Tables overviewTotal Match Goals statsTotal match goals stats
Total match goals stats (last 8 matches)
Total match goals stats (at home)
Total match goals stats (away)
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
